If less hair helped, why didn’t humans become fully hairless?
Show answer & explanation
Answer: Some hair still helped
Some hair still helped ✓ — Correct! Humans did not simply lose hair everywhere. Hair stayed where it still helped, such as on the scalp, eyebrows, and eyelashes.
Evolution stopped halfway — Wrong. Evolution does not aim for a perfect endpoint. Traits stay when they still provide useful functions.
Hair was too costly — Wrong. The issue was not that hair was simply too costly, but that different body areas faced different pressures.
More Evolution & Genetics questions
- Which of the following best describes a common change in RNA transcript length with age?
- Why do different organs in mammals show different gene activity patterns related to longevity?
- What can researchers learn about people of the same age from separate RNA-based aging clocks that estimate age from inflammation-related and metabolism-related gene activity?
- Aging RNA signals grouped into modules, not one score. What does a module view reveal?
- Why might aging mouse, monkey, and human cells show similar changes in the RNA they produce across different tissues?
- Why does a platypus still count as a mammal when it lays eggs and has no nipples?